Forest management and failure to thin

Man thinning underbrush in forest

The Rim Fire in California is just a couple thousand acres away from becoming the
third largest fire in that state’s history. Let’s look at the statistics so far:

  • Started August 17
  • 237,341 acres (371 sq. miles) burned so far
  • Bay Area water supply threatened at one point
  • $77 million cost to date

Here’s something of note—nearly half of the Rim Fire burned in the first two
days
. Fire experts attribute decades of fire suppression and other human-caused
changes to spreading the fire. Once the blaze reached Yosemite National Park, where
the National Park Service has performed fire control projects to reduce stocked fuels
in recent years, and lets naturally sparked fires burn, the fire slowed down its
advance.

My question is… how can we NOT afford forest management? Why not reduce stocked
fuels through thinning and then torrefy that biomass to produce energy dense biofuel?

“My view is that unless we get ahead of the fuels/restoration problem in forests that
once experienced frequent fire, wildfires influenced by climate change will burn them
at severtities and spatial scales that will not conserve forests into the future,”
says Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at the Unversity of California,
Berkeley.

The increasing severity of wildfires should concern all of us who look at forests as a
way to capture carbon dioxide. How California’s Rim Fire Grew So Big is a very
informative piece at livescience.com. You’ll also find a time-lapse video
of the fire
on the same site.

HM3 Energy